|
Thank you for writing me and for your concern for the animals
in King County’s care. Because of the large volume of
calls and emails I’ve received, I’m sending this
e-newsletter on animal care and control to try and respond
to you in a timely manner. You may also be receiving this
e-newsletter if you have written to me in the past about this
topic.
I won't be able to answer every specific point, but I hope
to cover many of the concerns you expressed and questions
you have asked. I have broken the e-newsletter down by frequently
asked questions and their answers, to better help you navigate
this lengthy email.
Thank you for your interest in and concern for the animals
in our shelters.
Sincerely,
Julia
Patterson
King County Councilmember - District 5
Frequently
asked questions about King County Animal Care and Control
What
is the status of Animal Care and Control after the press conference
on Sunday and briefing on Monday?
On Sunday, Councilmembers Constantine and Dunn joined me to
hold a press conference announcing our decision to close the
Kent and Crossroads shelters. The Inter-branch Work Group
the Council and Executive appointed in April, which included
members from the Executive, Council, Public Health, the Sheriff’s
Office and the Prosecutor’s office, had just completed
their strategic and operational plan for the shelter. Although
the work group presented 3 options for moving forward, it
was clear to us that the first and second option would fail
to bring about the change needed for King County to be a model
program.
On Monday, the Council was briefed by the Inter-branch Work
Group on the 3 operational options in their report. These
options include:
- The
first is the STATUS QUO MODEL–
where King County continues to provide field services
and operate the animal shelters. This option would also
likely require us to invest millions of dollars to build
a new shelter.
- The
second option is the COUNTY REORGANIZATION MODEL
– where King County continues to provide field services
and operate the animal shelters but some functions would
be transferred to the Sheriff’s Office and Public
Health.
- The
third option is the COMMUNITY-BASED SERVICES MODEL
– which looks beyond county government and explores
what community partnerships we can make to deliver humane
care.
The
Council has asked that our staff explore how to implement
the third option, based on a community partnership model.
This model includes the following elements:
- King
County will work with a community partner who can create
a model program for the humane care of animals, one that
all people in the county can be proud of.
- King
County will retain many of the county’s current
responsibilities and divide them among the branches of
county government with expertise in those areas:
- For
example, the King County Sheriff’s Office could
investigate animal cruelty cases and animal attacks.
The Sheriff has the skills and the appropriate level
of authority to safely conduct cruelty investigations.
- Public
Health – Seattle & King County could take
over inspection and licensing of pet shops and kennels
in the unincorporated areas and contract cities, a
service it already provides inside the city of Seattle.
Public Health has the institutional expertise and
authority to address sanitation and zoonotic disease
control. Public Health would retain responsibility
for control of communicable disease and oversight
of rabies quarantine.
-
The Records and Licensing Services Division could
take over pet licensing, a duty for which it is well-suited.
What
is the rationale for the decisions about Animal Care and Control?
For the last nearly two years, the King County Council has
passed legislation with the intent of King County becoming
a model animal care provider. Our goals for the shelter, and
our values for the care we expect for the animals in King
County’s care, are:
- We
want to reduce euthanasia rates as low as possible—ensuring
that no animal, unless they’re too ill or too vicious—is
ever put down.
- We
want to increase the number of adoptions, so that every
animal in our shelter has the opportunity to be placed
in a loving home.
- We
want to reduce the number of homeless pets by providing
low-cost, spay and neuter services to every animal not
meant to be bred.
- We
want to ensure that every animal in our care has proper
medical care, adequate food and water, and space to exercise
and play.
For
the past two years, we on the Council have worked very hard
to set policies to achieve these goals. However, four independent
outside entities have reported that King County Animal Services
still falls short:
-
Our Citizens Advisory Committee was unanimous on what
it called the “deplorable state of King County
shelters.”
- A
consultant hired by the Council said: “The same
problems that plagued the shelter ten years ago plague
the shelter today.”
- A
consultant hired by the Executive said: “It
was evident that the capacity of both staff and facility
was exceeded in almost every area of animal housing and
care.”
-
And veterinarians who volunteered at the shelter last
summer but quit, said they “did not want to
act as enablers to the proven failed procedures.”
The situation is unacceptable to me and to my colleagues.
King County has an absolute obligation to provide these animals
with humane care, medical treatment, and food and shelter.
These vulnerable creatures must be cared for as we would care
for our own pets—and given the best chance to be reunited
with their families or placed in a loving home. We have not
wavered from these standards in our deliberations.
We
have completed our review process and made what we think is
the right decision. And we pledge to keep the best interests
of these shelter animals foremost in our minds as we negotiate
this challenging transition.
When
will the public be able to weigh into the Council’s
process for getting out of the shelter business?
The King County Council will have to draft legislation to
implement the appropriate changes to King County Code and
the county’s organizational structure. When those ordinances
are ready, we will hold public hearings and citizens will
have a chance to comment on these ordinances.
In
addition to the public King County will include your city
leaders in the process. We currently provide animal services
to 34 cities and, during the transition, we will work to include
those cities in a negotiated agreement with the community
partner, if that city wants to take part.
What
is the transition timeline?
It will take at least six to nine months to make the kind
of transition we propose. As staff develop a transition plan
for Council members to consider, we will have a better idea
about how long each element of the transition will take, including
the transfer of functions to Public Health, Records and Licensing,
Sheriff’s department, and a community partner shelter.
How will we work with shelter
employees during the transition?
There are many important factors to consider during the transition,
including the effect that moving to a community-based system
will have on our valued county employees.
We
are fortunate to have many fine employees working in our shelters
now. This is in no way a reflection on their dedication and
hard-work. What we seek here are reforms in leadership and
management that will lead us to a model animal welfare program.
Our
employees and their representatives will certainly be part
of our discussions as we develop a transition plan for a new
organizational model.
Just
as we want to create a model program for the animals, we must
have a good solution for the hard-working staff who have been
caring for those animals.
Where
will the Kent shelter animals go?
Contrary to what you may be hearing, the shelter animals will
NOT be turned out on the streets. Because the Council’s
top priority is ensuring the best care possible for these
animals, we will structure the transition from county-run
to community partner-run sheltering in a way that has the
least amount of disruption for the animals. Additionally,
the partnership we design must contain the following elements:
-
The partner or partners must have the capacity to accommodate
all of the animals in our Kent and Crossroads shelters.
-
The partner(s) must be a proven model program, with a
track record of excellent care for animals, high adoption
rates, and aggressive spay/neuter programs.
-
The partner must have strong relationships with volunteers,
rescue organizations, and the public to ensure that its
operations are sustainable and rooted in community support.
What will
a community partnership cost?
King County currently appropriates about $5.5 million to Animal
Care and Control.
According to the inter-branch work group report, the status
quo model that includes all the elements to make our shelter
a model program might cost about $8.3 million. A community
partnership is projected to require about the same funding
as King County is currently allocating for Animal Care and
Control.
However, until we have a negotiated agreement with a community
partner it’s too soon to put a dollar figure on the
model.
What we do know is this:
-
The report indicates that a community partnership might
be the least costly of the three options before us.
- Cost
is not the reason why we are proposing this new model.
- We
are choosing this organizational model because the model
we have just isn’t working.
Would
this include Animal Control (dog catcher, enforcement) functions?
The King County Council has not made a final decision about
this function. First, it was not thoroughly studied during
the inter-branch work group process. Second, we do not know
if there are outside entities that would be willing or able
to provide these services.
As
the Council considers a transition plan, we will also make
decisions about whether or not we will continue to provide
these services.
|