King County Navigation Bar (text navigation at bottom)
  King County Elections

King County Local Voters' Pamphlet

November 4, 2008 General Election


County

Simple majority (Wash. Const. art. XI, sec. 4 and King County Charter Section 800).

King County Charter Amendment No. 8
Nonpartisan Elections


Shall the King County Charter be amended to make the offices of King county executive, King county assessor and King county council nonpartisan, and to establish the nonpartisan selection of districting committee members?

YES
NO

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

If this charter amendment is approved, the offices of county executive, assessor, and council member would be elected according to general law governing nonpartisan elections with the first nonpartisan elections occurring at the next regularly scheduled election for each office. For the county executive and council members for odd-numbered council districts, that would be November 2009 and for the assessor and council members for even-numbered council districts, it would be November 2011. Nonpartisan elections would be held every four years thereafter and any vacancies would be filled pursuant to general law governing vacancies for nonpartisan county elective office. Approval of the charter amendment would also result in districting committee members, who are appointed by the council every ten years for the purpose of drawing a countywide districting plan, no longer being appointed based on political party.

Statement For

What unites Democratic Governor Booth Gardner and Republican Governor Dan Evans?  They agree with over 64% of King County voters that local government should deliver basic services to all citizens regardless of party preference.

Nonpartisan county government will: • Improve voter choice • Increase competition in elections • Reduce partisan bickering • Restore local priorities and service.

Local elections are about voters making independent choices based on a candidate’s qualifications, not party labels.

Infighting and partisan bickering are a diversion from addressing the public’s real needs. There are no Republican roads or Democratic stoplights!

Nonpartisan reform improves voter choice by attracting more candidates and making elections more competitive.

Since 2000, eight county councilmembers have run for office without any opposition. In 2007, partisan incumbents outraised their opponents 26 to1! Voters need real choices in elections.

The voter-approved citizens’ initiative (I-26) proposing this nonpartisan reform was supported by: • The Seattle Times • The Seattle PI • The Municipal League of King County • Over 40 nonpartisan Mayors and City Councilmembers • The Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce • Over 80,000 signatures from King County Voters.

Please Vote YES for real change in county government, Vote YES on Charter Amendment 8.


Rebuttal of Statement Against

Non-partisanship preserves our “right to know.” 

• Non-partisan candidates are free to list endorsements on literature and in the voters’ guide.

Non-partisanship encourages cooperation.

• Non-partisanship allows officials to work together without the division of party politics.

• Of the 12 most populous U.S. counties, half are non-partisan.

Non-partisanship provides more choice in elections.

• Non-partisanship will end party control and attract more qualified candidates to run for local office.

Please VOTE YES! www.bettercounty.org

STATEMENT PREPARED BY: Booth Gardner, Dan Evans, Sue Singer

 

Statement Against

Citizens have a right to know who candidates for public office are and what they stand for. Political party preference is the single piece of objective information about a candidate that appears on the ballot. Initiative 26 eliminates that information.

King County is not a small jurisdiction in which most citizens know their elected officials personally. It is the 13th largest county by population in the United States. The nine County Council districts each include about 200,000 residents.

From January 1998 through mid-2007, a period of 9 1/2 years, there were only 23 straight party line votes by the County Council, or fewer than three a year. During that same period, 94% of County Council votes were unanimous.

The system put in place by voters when they approved King County’s Home Rule Charter in 1969 has served us well. Under our present system, voters can vote on the same ballot for candidates of any party, and we do. Initiative 26 denies the voters critical information about the political philosophy that their elected officials will apply to future decisions. Please vote NO on Initiative 26.


Rebuttal Of Statement For

Elections are about voters making informed choices.

Charter Amendment 8 simply puts less information about candidates on the ballot. It does nothing to increase competition or attract more candidates. Non-partisan city officials across King County routinely run for re-election unopposed or with token opposition.

State voters chose a non-partisan primary system — the Top Two — but wisely kept candidates' political party preference on the ballot.

Don't take away voter information — VOTE NO on Charter Amendment 8.

STATEMENT PREPARED BY: Mike Lowry, Sharon Tomiko Santos

 

 

Complete Text of Resolution

AN ORDINANCE proposing an initiative to amend the King County Charter to make the offices of King County executive, King County assessor and King County council nonpartisan, and to establish the nonpartisan selection of districting committee members; amending Section 610 of the King County Charter, Section 640 of the King County Charter, Section 650.20 of the King County Charter, Section 650.30.20 of the King County Charter and Section 680.10 of the King County Charter, repealing Section 620 of the King County Charter and submitting the same to the voters of the county for their approval or rejection at the next special election to be held in this county more than one-hundred thirty-five days after the presentment of petitions to the King County council.

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:

SECTION 1. There shall be submitted to the qualified voters of King County for their approval and ratification or rejection, at the next general election to be held in this county occurring more than forty-five days after the enactment of this ordinance, an amendment to the King County Charter by amending Section 610, Section 640, Section 650.20, Section 650.30.20 and Section 680.10 and repealing Section 620, to read as follows:

Section 610. Election Procedures.

((Except as provided in the Article, t)) The nominating primaries and elections for the offices of King County executive, King County assessor and King County council shall be conducted in accordance with general law governing the election of ((partisan)) nonpartisan county officers.

Section 640. County Executive and Assessor.

The county executive and county assessor shall be nominated and elected as nonpartisan offices by the voters of the county. The nomination and election of the county executive and county assessor shall be held every four years as a county general election at the same time as the general election for cities in the county commencing with the election of 1971 for the county assessor and with the election of 1973 for the county executive.

Section 650.20. Nomination and Election.

County councilmembers shall be nominated and elected as nonpartisan offices by the voters of each councilmember’s respective district. The nomination and election of ((councilmen)) councilmembers shall be held every four years as a county general election at the same time as the general election for cities in the county commencing in even-numbered districts with the election of 1971 and in odd-numbered districts with the election of 1973.

Section 650.30.20. Districting Committee.

During the month of January, 2001, and by January 31 ((st)) of each tenth year thereafter, a five-member districting committee shall be appointed. The county council shall appoint four persons to the committee, ((two from each of the two major political parties,)) the four to appoint the fifth who shall be the chairperson. The districting committee shall no later than April 1 following their appointment meet and appoint a districting master who shall be qualified by education, training and experience to draw a districting plan. If the districting committee is unable to agree upon the appointment of a districting master by April 1, the county council shall appoint a districting master by May 31 ((st)) of the year.

Section 680.10. Designation, Appointment and Election to Fill Vacancy.

Immediately upon commencing their terms of office, the county executive, assessor and sheriff shall each designate one or more employees who serve as a deputy or assistant in such office to serve as an interim official in the event of a vacancy in the elective office of the county executive, assessor((,)) or sheriff, respectively.

Except for a designation made by the metropolitan county council, a designation of an interim official shall only be effective if the county executive, assessor and sheriff, each for his or her elective office, complies with the following procedure; commits the designation to writing; identifies the order of precedence if more than one county officer or employee is designated; signs the written designation; has the written designation notarized; files the written designation with the county office responsible for records ((and elections)); and((,)) provides a copy of the written designation to the chair of the metropolitan county council. The county executive, assessor and sheriff may, at any time, amend such designation by complying with the same procedure established for making the designation.

In the event the county executive, assessor((,)) or sheriff neglects or fails to make such a designation within seven calendar days of commencing his or her term of office, the metropolitan county council may by ordinance designate one or more employees who serve as a deputy or assistant in such office to serve as an interim official in the event of a vacancy in the elective office of the county executive, assessor(,)) or sheriff, respectively. A designation made by the metropolitan county council shall be effective upon adoption of the ordinance therefor and may be amended by ordinance; provided that a designation by the county executive, assessor((,)) or sheriff which occurs subsequent to the adoption of an ordinance shall take precedence over the designation by ordinance.

The designated county officer or employee shall immediately upon the occurrence of a vacancy serve as the interim official and shall exercise all the powers and duties of the office granted by this charter and general law until an acting official is appointed as provided in this section.

The metropolitan county council shall, after being appraised of a vacancy in the elective office of county executive, assessor or sheriff, fill the vacancy by the appointment of an employee who served as a deputy or assistant in such office at the time vacancy occurred as an acting official to perform all necessary duties to continue normal office operations. The acting official shall serve until the vacancy is filled by appointment ((pursuant to Article II, section 15, of the Washington State Constitution for partisan county elective offices or)) pursuant to general law for nonpartisan county elective offices ((, as applicable)).

A vacancy in an elective county office shall be filled at the next primary and general elections which occur in the county; provided that an election to fill the vacancy shall not be held if the successor to the vacated office will be elected at the next general election as provided in Sections 640 and 645 of this charter. The term of office of an officer who has been elected to fill a vacancy shall only be for the unexpired portion of the term of the officer whose office has become vacant and shall commence as soon as he or she is elected and qualified.

A majority of the county council may temporarily fill a vacancy by appointment until the vacancy has been filled by election or the successor to the office has been elected and qualified.

Section 620 repealed. Section 620, “Independent Candidates,” of the King County Charter is hereby repealed.

SECTION 2. If this ordinance is enacted, the ballot title for the proposed charter amendment shall be in substantially the following form, with such additions, deletions or modifications as may be required by the prosecuting attorney:

This initiative would place the following proposed charter amendment on the November 2008 general election ballot: “Shall the King County Charter be amended to make the offices of King county executive, King county assessor and King county council nonpartisan, and to establish the nonpartisan selection of districting committee members?” Should this initiative be adopted?

Section 3. A. If this ordinance is approved by a majority of the voters voting on the issue, it shall become enacted when the results of the election are certified.

B. If this ordinance is enacted, the question of amendment of the King County Charter shall be submitted to the qualified voters of King County for their approval and ratification or rejection at the next general election forty-five days after enactment of this ordinance.