Skip navigation.
 

Indicators

2010 Rating Red

Aquatic biota

Pie chart showing Aquatic biota components
Indicator Key

About this indicator: King County's Aquatic Biota Index is derived from two main groupings of results regarding numbers of fish and stream insects. Chinook salmon are the only fish reflected in this category. Other fish species should be included in the assessment of aquatic biota health, but there is no consistently collected data regarding these animals in King County.

Status: Information gathered over the last 100 years indicates an overall decline in the health of native, naturally spawning salmon populations in Puget Sound watersheds.

Influencing factors: Development and deteriorating water quality impact wildlife habitat — particularly the amounts of hard or paved surfaces, loss of tree cover and other changes to natural environments.

What you can do:

  • Plant trees and reduce impervious surfaces by using pervious pavers in drive and walkways.
  • Encourage your local city or town to make tree protection regulations stronger.
  • Contact your elected officials and express how important wildlife protections are to you—including salmon restoration.

More information about King County's Fish and Stream Insects is available by continuing below for these measures:


Chinook Salmon

  Graph showing percent of 2055 recovery goal 
acheived in WRIAs 7, 8 and 9
Graph showing estimated natural 
chinook salmon escapement
About this indicator: Salmonid fishes native to King County include chinook, coho, sockeye/kokanee, pink and chum salmon, rainbow (including the anadromous form called "steelhead"), cutthroat, bull and dolly varden trout and pygmy and mountain whitefish. Each of these species has a diverse life history and relies upon a range of habitats for spawning, rearing, feeding and migration. They also have major cultural, economic and political roles in the Pacific Northwest. Of these, Chinook, Bull trout, and Steelhead have been listed for protection under the Endangered Species Act. Throughout much of Washington State, the harvest and hatchery propagation of these fish populations and to a lesser extent, their habitat, are co-managed by the State of Washington, through the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WA DFW), and the treaty Indian tribes.

King County includes all or portions of four major watersheds, which are denitified by Watershed Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA): the Snohomish (WRIA 7), Cedar/Lake Washington (WRIA 8), Green/Duwamish (WRIA 9) and Puyallup/White (WRIA 10). Although King County does not manage fish populations directly, it does have jurisdictional responsibility for many activities, including land-use regulation, which greatly influences the quantity, quality and distribution of salmon habitats.

Natural chinook salmon spawning ground escapement is the number of mature, adult chinook salmon that escape fisheries and return to their stream of origin to spawn naturally. It is an indicator of the abundance of chinook salmon and can be used, along with other population indicators, to evaluate the overall health of marine and freshwater ecosystems.

Chinook salmon long-term recovery goals (recovery goals) were established to be reflective of characteristics of a viable salmon population1: abundance, geographic distribution, genetic and phenotypic diversity and productivity. These recovery goals were established for watersheds through the cooperative Puget Sound Shared Strategy process. The recovery goals to be targeted are 64,000 for WRIA 7, 12,200 for WRIA 8 and 27,000 for WRIA 9. There are no recovery goals for WRIA 10.

This indicator is based on the percent of natural chinook salmon escapement with respect to an adjusted annual recovery goal for each WRIA, where applicable. Our weighting system for this indicator is applied equally to WRIA 7, 8 and 9

Status: The fish counts for WRIAs 7, 8 and 9 have been on a decreasing trend since about 2000-2004. For WRIAs 7 and 9, the fish counts are up from 2009 by almost double and triple, respectively. The WRIA 10 fish count has shown a increasing trend since the 1980s. Natural variations are expected due to a wide variety of influencing factors. Overall, the natural chinook salmon escapement results in 2010 for each WRIA were far below the respective adjusted annual recovery goal and comprised of only 7 percent of the recovery target.

Influencing factors: Natural Chinook salmon escapement is related to the habitat and water quality of the County's rivers and streams, along with several other factors such as precipitation, hatcheries, biology, harvest, and flow management. Some annual variation in salmon returns is to be expected and is unrelated to local human influences. For example, natural cycles of ocean warming and cooling and longer term trends in climate can also greatly affect local salmonid productivity.

Existing DNRP response: Inter-jurisdictional, watershed-based salmon conservation plans have been completed for WRIA's 7, 8, 9 and 10. The plans were submitted to federal agencies for review in 2005, and accepted by the National Marine Fisheries Service in February 2006 with a few additions. The plans include actions for meeting long-term recovery goals. King County serves as the lead agency for two WRIA's and participates in the efforts and activities of all four. The county will continue its participation in the WRIA process and the larger, region wide Shared Strategy For Puget Sound process to secure funding for and implement the measures identified in these plans toward habitat improvement projects that should help to recover the species.

Priority new actions: King County is in the implementation phase for the WRIA 7, 8 and 9 Salmon Conservation and Habitat Plans.

1 A viable salmon population is defined as one with a negligible risk of extinction in 100 years. Negligible has been taken to mean less than 5%.


Stream Insect Health

Benthic index of biotic intregrity results for stream stationsAbout this indicator: King County monitors stream health by collecting samples of benthic macroinvertebrates, commonly referred to as "bugs," from selected streams.

Scientists use a scorecard system called the Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity (B-IBI) to rank stream health. The BIBI scores are based on the type and number of stream bugs present in the stream. This scoring system allows comparison of different streams to each other and can also be used to rank general ecological health of the streams. The BIBI scoring system ranks sites as Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor or Very Poor.

Status: Samples are collected annually from approximately 125 - 150 stations (approx. 100 streams and tributaries) within 37 sub-basins across the Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish (WRIA 8) and the Green/Duwamish (WRIA 9) watersheds. In 2010, samples were collected from 143 sites; these samples are currently being analyzed. Results for samples collected in 2009 are the most recent available data. When data from all sites (n=128) are combined and compared across all sampling sites results are generally similar to previous years. The percent of sites classified as "Very Poor" in 2008 decreased slightly from 19% to 11% in 2009; . In 2009 approximately 46% (compared to 51% in 2008) of the sites in WRIA 8 and 37% (compared to 42% in 2008) of the sites in WRIA 9 were classified as Very Poor or Poor. Only 5% of the sites in WRIA 8 and 2% of the sites in WRIA 9 were classified as Excellent.

Influencing factors: Development, pollutants in stormwater runoff, loss of forest cover, elevated stream temperatures, and invasive and non-native plants are a few factors that can influence stream macroinvertebrate populations. Property access and insufficient flows in streams can influence the number of sampling sites, affecting annual comparisons.

Existing DNRP response: WLRD continues to implement programs that focus on minimizing degradation associated with development and pollutant runoff from farms, maintaining forest cover and its numerous stormwater benefits, or implementing watershed improvement projects. King County's Stormwater Program focuses on flow control to minimize adverse effects from development, provides surface water design standards for new development and inspects and maintains stormwater control facilities.

The county continues to work with landowners to restore streamside parcels that have important benefits as aquatic resources. In addition, WLRD's capital projects program builds small and large stream and wetland enhancement projects. Basin stewards work with the local community to respond to resident's inquiries for watershed protection, coordinate efforts among diverse public agencies and facilitate watershed project implementation. The Agriculture Program works with farmers and livestock owners to prevent agricultural pollutants from running off into streams.

Priority new actions: Implementation of the county's Critical Areas Ordinance and federal total maximum daily load (TMDL) requirements for impaired water bodies are regulations that will also support water quality improvements in both incorporated and unincorporated areas.

Additional data and monitoring program details can be found at http://www.pugetsoundstreambenthos.org. This site includes the data summarized above, in addition to data for other monitoring programs throughout the region.

King County recently received an Environmental Protection Agency Grant to enhance and standardize benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring tools for the Puget Sound Region. The grant will enhance collaboration and partnerships throughout the region and ultimately improve the ability to evaluate regional trends in stream health.

Map showing stream insect health
Stream Insect Health
2009 Findings
Click to download the PDF version.

Technical Notes

For definitions and more detail.

Back to top KingStat

We welcome your feedback and suggestions to improve this site, such as:

  • Other reliable environmental data sources for King County
  • Adjustments to the weightings for indicators and performance measures
  • Mistakes to fix

Share your thoughts by sending an e-mail to Richard Gelb, DNRP Performance Measurement Lead, at richard.gelb@kingcounty.gov so your input can be considered for subsequent updates.

Updated: August 17, 2011